Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:30

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ready or Not adjusts in-game violence and nudity on PC to secure PS5 and Xbox release - Eurogamer
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
What are some reasons why some men choose to live alone instead of getting married?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Qualifying results: Shore Lunch 250 presented by Dutch Boy at Elko Speedway - arcaracing.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
10 candidates who could fill the Dallas Stars’ head coaching vacancy - Dallas News
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Royal Caribbean crew members shares onboard secrets - TheStreet
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Accidental find in planetarium show could shift scientists’ understanding of our solar system - CNN
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.